( No Title )
There’s something I’ve never quite understood about the mentality of those who are pro mass migration, and it’s the fact they’re against land being taken from indigenous people.
Now, if you aren’t following, mass migration displaces indigenous people from their land, and if you are following, you’ll know that indigenous doesn’t mean non-white.
Indigenous peoples are inheritors and practitioners of unique cultures and ways of relating to people and the environment. They have social, cultural, economic and political characteristics that are distinct from those of foreign import.
Despite the hijacking of the term by the politically bent, indigenous can refer to anyone of any culture, so long as the cultures and peoples of said cultures have remained in the geographical region for multiple centuries, have developed as culturally distinct and have maintained this for said amount of time.
For example, the English are more indigenous to England than the Maori are to New Zealand, so why do we cheer on the English being replaced on their own indigenous land? Is it some sick revenge fetish the left has? If so, why punish the English? They’re as much a victim of the British Empire as any other culture, infact I’d argue they’re the last people still under the colonial rule of the British Empire, the Welsh, Scotts and Norther Irish have their own devolved Parliaments, but the English do not.
Sorry, got off track, anyway, the term indigenous doesn’t mean much when you think about it, Canadians are indigenous to the land now known as Canada, they’ve inhabited it since 1534, and have developed a unique culture, way of life, unique way of relating to the people and environment and have social, cultural economic and political characteristics that are distinct from foreign imports, these have been developed and passed down hereditarily for nearly 500 years, this however is different from the English example, for the nation of Canada is one where everyone can come so long as they choose to be Canadian, but that doesn’t change that there are indigenous Canadians who shouldn’t be displaced to make room for new migrants our infrastructure can’t support.
I think the main point I’m trying to make is this, Europe for the Europeans, the Middle East for the Middle Easterners, Asia for the Asians, Africa for the Africans etc etc.
Mass migration helps none except the corporations and the rich as it drives wages down, raises the cost of living and makes a nation one incapable of supporting anyone with low income, incremental immigration where few can come in over decades is what we need, especially if those indigenous advocates want their token indigenous groups they fetishize to survive, culturally and literally.
Man I’m rambling today.
Hope everyone understands what I’m attempting to say.
TLDR Why do the dipshits support immigration when it’s against certain people, but not others? They damn the pilgrims for what happened to the natives, but fuck every white culture that’s native to their land, get some color in there.
I’ve heard some claim it’s because, “white people created the circumstances that caused these migrations,” but that always came across like the negative format of “The White Man’s burden.” Instead of, “we are obligated to uplift these primative savages, because we are the morally superior people” it’s, “we are obligated to uplift these inferior people because of the sins of our fathers.”
“The surest way to work up a crusade in favor of some ‘good cause’ is to promise people they will have a chance of maltreating someone. To be able to destroy with good conscience, to be able to behave badly and call your bad behavior ‘righteous indignation’ — this is the height of psychological luxury, the most delicious of moral treats.” – Aldous Huxley
Discussion ¬