This year. Last year. Generations. All over the world.
The selective service is when men must sign their lives away if the government asks. If they do not.m they can be jailed or receive a 250k fine. If youre jailed, you lose your right to vote along with-
Which also counts as systematic misandry.
The US had talks about adding women to the draft, but women, especially feminists, were strongly against this gender equality.
But if you wanna go a different route, we coukd bring up that men have no reproductive rights. And at least half of tge argument for abortion isnt about pregnancy, but feeling forced into parenthood.
Women had to fight for those things, especially when women were not considered mentally fit or fiscally responsible to own credit cards until the 1970s, the same decade you went off to Vietnam.
Voting – again, males got that first. It was reserved for property owners, then extended to all males. Free black men had the right to vote in the 1880s, 50 years before all women could have it federally (a woman’s right to vote differed by state, for example in Wyoming they could vote in the 1880s).
On reproductive rights: all you have to do is ejaculate in a woman. That’s it. Pregnancy is 100% on you; women do not get pregnant on their own. So if you are complaining about the unfairness of child support and family courts – stop ejaculating in women!
Now, if you want to talk about the immigration angle, well. Pregnant women can get immediate citizenship for their babies via anchor baby schemes, whereas men have to wait.
Women clearly didnt fight for equality. If you fight for only the positives, but not the costs that come with it, then it isnt equality.
A little offended that youre comparing having a credit card to being forced to fight, possibly dying, in a war. These arent comparable. I would give up my credit card right now if that was the price to pay to avoid the draft. Avoiding war. Avoiding killing other people, inckuding children if need be. Avoiding serious injury, PTSD, being a prisoner of war, etc. War is hell. Not being ableto have a credit card and only being ableto use cash sucks, but it is nowhere near as bad as being forced into war. This was not a good comparison to make a point.
Men also fought for women. Much moreso than women fought for men’s issues. Men funded and supported women’s shelters and policies/laws that supported women. Women (feminist groups) closed down abuse shelters for men and opposed (often successfully) policies and laws to protect men.
Voting: Women got the right to vote without the cost of the selective service. You got that just for being women. That might have gotten a pass back then, but it still applies today. Even the voting age drop was just given to women. When the conscription age (for men) dropped from 21 to 18, people marched and demanded the voting age drop as well. “Old enough to fight, old enough to vote”. Well the government agreed and droped the votong age to 18. But for everyone, including women, who were not required to sign for the SS and couldnt be drafted. The government cant even touch it because if they raised the voting age for women (which is technically equality), it would be seen as misogyny.
Reproduction: men have NO REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS. Not some, none. This includes if women rape a man (or child) or obtain his sperm in any other illegal way (like stealing a used condom).
Not that it matters. A child is more than 9 months and you know it. It’s 18+ years. A TON, if not most of the pro-chojce argument has nothing to do with pregancy, and more to do with being forced to raise a child. Heck, if that lady who stole Drake’s used condom out of the trash to impregante herself wasnt suspicious, Drake may have had a child he had no say in.
Maybe the mother
Wants to focus on her career
On school
On her dreams
Maybe she doesnt likethe father
Maybe she isnt financially ready
Emotionally ready
Physically ready
Maybe she doesnt like kids. Or doesnt want them yet.
These are all acceptable reasons to not have a baby (from the “progressive” side). And they all apply to men.But men who dont a baby for the same reasons are called “deadbeats”.
Women legally make the decision of parenthood *for* the man. Not with him. He has no legal say on this life-changing decision. He has no legal way to opt out of parenthood without the woman’s decision. And she can just say no. He needs her permission to sign rights away. He needs permission to not sign for child support. He needs permission to give a child up for adoption. And she can sue him for child support, almost always getting it.
Women, however, have the pill, abortion, and adoption, none of which require the man’s permission (adoption has loopholes to avoid male permission).
Heck, women dont even legally have tp tell the man that he has a child. Men dont even have the right to know that they have repruduced. If a hospital lied about the child being dead or even swapped the child with another baby, the hospital is sued for millions. The legal argument is not being able to raise ypur own child. Missing out on that opportunity. Well that’s the reality for so many men. They didnt even have a choice in parenthood.
And, on the topic of not having controk over our bodies, allow me to circumcision to the table. Something socially acceptable for men, but not for women. A decision typically made by the mother.
The feminist argument that men face np issues of inequality or that misandry isnt real is a tiring one because it has convicned so many people that the same issues affecting men are nonexistent. We have to remind them and convince people that men deal woth very real systematic issues of inequality. Which, yes, include not having control of our bodies.
Your response was disingenuous. You didnt seem to care about or advocate for victims of inequality. You defended women. There’s a difference.
Women clearly didnt fight for equality. If you fight for only the positives, but not the costd that come with it, then it isnt equality.
Women were barred from university – previously all reserved for men – from voting, and from working even when pregnant even if that money was needed for her security. It was 1974 when women could get credit cards.
In terms of education, Colonial attitudes towards gender and education differed by state. In New England, 90% of women could read and nearly all men could. Again, it was stressed that women’s education wasn’t important and not needed. So, women had to fight to be even taken seriously in a sphere that was dominated by your sex. Why? Because your sex didn’t think we were intellectually capable.
Men also fought for women. Much moreso than women fought for men’s issues. Men funded and supported women’s shelters and policies/laws that supported women. Women (feminist groups) closed down abuse shelters for men and opposed (often successfully) policies and laws to protect men.
The Christian Women’s Union and the Suffragettes both fought to raise age of consent laws, which men were largely opposed to raising. Why? Well because sex trafficking was common then, for young girls and boys.
Maybe ask why your source continues to be overrepresented in sex crimes.
Voting: Women got the right to vote without the cost of the selective service. You got that just for being women.
That might have gotten a pass back then, but it still applies today. Even the voting age drop was just given to women. When the conscription age (for men) dropped from 21 to 18, people marched and demanded the voting age drop as well. “Old enough to fight, old enough to vote”. Well the government agreed and droped the votong age to 18. But for everyone, including women, who were not required to sign for the SS and couldnt be drafted. The government cant even touch it because if they raised the voting age for women (which is technically equality), it would be seen as misogyny.
We had to fight for that right, especially when free blacks got it in 1880. Even the 19th Amendment was not fully ratified in certain states until the 1960s. In Florida, it wasn’t ratified until 1969, the same year man went to the moon.
Before universal suffrage for both sexes, women required a college degree and had to be over 21, whereas men just had to be men and be 18. Of course, getting a college degree was difficult as colleges were just beginning to accept women. That was the whole point of women’s suffrage.
If you want to argue that actually, the Puritans valued women’s education and consent and women’s voting differed by state and women COULD vote in 1776 in New Jersey until men fucked it up you can argue for it. I’ll gladly listen.
Reproduction: men have NO REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS. Not some, none. This includes if women rape a man (or child) or obtain his sperm in any other illegal way (like stealing a used condom).
Your sex is still responsible for around 99% of it though, be it towards females or other males. That is one point radfems are correct on.
Not that it matters. A child is more than 9 months and you know it. It’s 18+ years. A TON, if not most of the pro-chojce argument has nothing to do with pregancy, and more to do with being forced to raise a child. Heck, if that lady who stole Drake’s used condom out of the trash to impregante herself wasnt suspicious, Drake may have had a child he had no say in.
There is a double standard here when it comes to the pro choice/anti choice argument: men, on the one hand, argue abortion is murder, on the other, that they are the actual victims because they don’t get a say. Again, you impregnate females. 100% of the time. You say you are victims during child support because you are being held to raise a child you didn’t have a say in creating – you did – and say it is unfair to men even though if you want to halt abortion and create a new pro life culture you would support mandatory child support.
If forced pregnancy and forced fatherhood is wrong, then abstain from sex. That is what you tell women.
Maybe the mother
Wants to focus on her career
On school
On her dreams
Maybe she doesnt likethe father
Maybe she isnt financially ready
Emotionally ready
Physically ready
Maybe she doesnt like kids. Or doesnt want them yet.
These are all acceptable reasons to not have a baby (from the “progressive” side). And they all apply to men.But men who dont a baby for the same reasons are called “deadbeats”.
You sired that child. The woman did not get pregnant on her own. There are absolutely women who entrap men with babies the men do not want and you have valid legal concerns over that. But consider this: you complain that men are considered deadbeats for not wanting to take care of children they sire, yet women are murderers if they end the pregnancy.
Women legally make the decision of parenthood *for* the man. Not with him. He has no legal say on this life-changing decision. He has no legal way to opt out of parenthood without the woman’s decision. And she can just say no. He needs her permission to sign rights away. He needs permission to not sign for child support. He needs permission to give a child up for adoption. And she can sue him for child support, almost always getting it.
There is a saying that women become mothers at the moment of conception, but that fathers become fathers when he holds his child in his arms. This quote captures that attitude perfectly. You ejaculate in women; you create that embryo that will become a fetus and then a baby, and then suffer a crisis over the being you created being at the whims of its mother.
There is always a tug of war between feminists and MRAs and this argument shows it. When you are not complaining about how abortion is murder, you complain when the baby is alive and how the mother wants her dues, especially when you do not want that baby.
Women, however, have the pill, abortion, and adoption, none of which require the man’s permission (adoption has loopholes to avoid male permission).
Not now. But before, single couples couldn’t get contraception. And a reminder that the Male Pill was pulled for side effects that could make you feel sick when female birth control has a whole fucking host of side effects and was unethically tested on Puerto Rican women in the early days of the Pill.
Second, if you know anything about stepfathers and the abuse therein, you might have an inkling as to why the courts might just side with the mothers.
(Naturally, more studies are being done on the Male Pill and think about how easy it would be to shut off the sperm bank vs sealing up the whole dam.)
Heck, women dont even legally have tp tell the man that he has a child. Men dont even have the right to know that they have repruduced. If a hospital lied about the child being dead or even swapped the child with another baby, the hospital is sued for millions. The legal argument is not being able to raise ypur own child. Missing out on that opportunity. Well that’s the reality for so many men. They didnt even have a choice in parenthood.
You pump and dump all the time. I do think this behavior you mention is reprehensible, and the baby swapping thing is hard to do with paternity tests. Invest in it if you’re worried.
And, on the topic of not having controk over our bodies, allow me to circumcision to the table. Something socially acceptable for men, but not for women. A decision typically made by the mother.
Blame that on religion and culture, then. Not to mention if you know anything about female genital mutilation, in the worst cases nearly our entire labia and vagina is sewn up. There is a difference between having a foreskin removed and having a tiny hole meant for the baby to come out and where the stitches meant to close your vagina have to be manually removed or the scars torn open to aid with childbirth. Seriously, don’t be this fucking dense. If circumcision is wrong, leave it at that. You’ll find plenty of people willing to accept that all forms of it are wrong, be it on male or female.
The feminist argument that men face np issues of inequality or that misandry isnt real is a tiring one because it has convicned so many people that the same issues affecting men are nonexistent. We have to remind them and convince people that men deal woth very real systematic issues of inequality. Which, yes, include not having control of our bodies.
Sure. I’ll argue for it too. I’ll also let you in on a secret: I used to hang around MRAs circa 2011 and sympathized with your cause. But then it started being less about father’s rights and unfair family court issues and how women in general destroy civilization and how our existence makes your lives worse.
Just look at Better Bachelor or Think Before You Sleep on YouTube. Between them I cannot find the difference between MRA talking points and radfem ones.
Your response was disingenuous. You didnt seem to care about or advocate for victims of inequality. You defended women. There’s a difference.
Your original post was how men were denied federal grants and posts even though this isn’t true for men of other races.
1. Has absolutely nothing to do with my point.
I stated that it isnt fightong for equality if you only fight for the positives, but leave the costs to men. Men cannot vote without signing fir the selective service. The draft/selective service is the cost of voting. But only for men.
If you want equality, it means women get the good and the bad. Want the bad to go away? Advocate that for both.
2. Again, nothing to do with what I said. I specified that historically, men have supported women in women’s rights. Not all men, but enough to say that it isnt just women advocating for them. Meanwhile, the main oppisition to men’s rights is women (specifically feminists). And unlike men who oppised women, feminists who oppise men’s rights are seen positively.
3. 3rd time. You dont acknowledge what I said, you just try to make it into a competition.
And actually, voting rights were originally for land owners (both male and female), and in some states, literacy tests were in place. Which also targetted men.
My argument was that for the same rights, men must sacrifice more and are disadvataged more. When asking for “equality” those women did not ask for the same costs as men, and thus were not advocating for equality. Whether nale politicians sided with them (supported women) is irrelevent.
4. No. They arent. Rape, as a crime, is gendered by definition for most of the world’s population. So if you raped me right now, depending on our location, you would not be charged with rape and would not have said rape included in statistics.
That’s a major issue of inequality, but not related to my point. Once again, you ignore my point. It was that even in extreme cases, men have no say in if they are parents. Not just for a few cases, but flat across the board.
5. You clearly arent getting the issue. You want men to take responsibility, but not have a say.
“You sired the child” equally applies to women. According to your argument, women should never be ableto talethe pill, have abortions, or give children up for adoption.
“My body my rules” only makes sense of you inckude"my choice, my responsibility".
6. The “male pill” was pulled because of a signifigant increase in risk of suicide and the fact that it could sterilize the man. A birth control pill iseant to control repriduction, not permenantly stop it. If femalebirth control had a noticable chance to sterilize the woman so she could never have kids again (along woth making her way more likelyto kill herself), it would be pulled as well.
Not that it matters. Youre yet again glossing over my point that women have multiple ways to opt out of being a parent. Men have NONE.
7. This is just a waste of time at this point. You ha e no actual counterarguments. You just change the argument itself.
Men should have the right to know they have kids. This shouldnt even be a question. It’s a right men do not have. And if you care about equality or men (you clearly dont), then this should be an issue for you.
8. You dont know anything about circumcision. Babies can die from it, it is so painful and traumatic, that it literally changes a child’s brain, and all for something that doesnt matter (cleanliness which can be done with soap and water, appearance and reducing sexual pleasure).
9. Your experience with a select few MRAs do not speak on the movement. However, entire feminst organizations and famous feminists perpetuating misandry and systematic inequality woth suppirt of feminism does speak on feminism.
10. From the start, your respomses were nonsense. You made this into some kind of competition instead of admitting that these issues exist for men and should be handled.
Trying to blame men and insisting women have it worse to avoid addressing systemstic misandry is exactly why it isnt taken seriously to this day.
If you cant provide a valid counterargument (and it seems you cant), then this is a waste of time.
Here’s how it works, bud. You straight up said women shouldn’t have any say in the fight for our rights because we didn’t die in any wars. That’s a token MRA talking point, because it undermines what happens if you men lose. But baby steps.
1. Has absolutely nothing to do with my point.
I stated that it isnt fightong for equality if you only fight for the positives, but leave the costs to men. Men cannot vote without signing fir the selective service. The draft/selective service is the cost of voting. But only for men.
If you want equality, it means women get the good and the bad. Want the bad to go away? Advocate that for both.
Here’s what you said:
– Women don’t get a say in our voting rights because we didn’t apply for the draft. Which brings us to B: even if they WERE, you’d still complain because women would drag down the men. You cannot have it both ways. You, as males, were enfranchised first. Because you were viewed as intellectually superior and women as the destroyers of civilization; as being eternal children. Ever read Schopenhauer? He says as much.
So, you get to fight and die in a war for the right to vote. And you use that argument to say women just sat at home and twiddled our thumbs. Even when we legally were not considered people in most areas.
2. Again, nothing to do with what I said. I specified that historically, men have supported women in women’s rights. Not all men, but enough to say that it isnt just women advocating for them. Meanwhile, the main oppisition to men’s rights is women (specifically feminists). And unlike men who oppised women, feminists who oppise men’s rights are seen positively.
You wrote that men supported women’s suffrage before walking that back. Makes sense, as men used to stage walkouts when women first entered college and said women shouldn’t be on trains as the G force would suck out uteruses out. There’s also the time you couldn’t keep your hands to yourselves and banned the use of hatpins because women used to stab grabby men with it.
You opposed women from entering higher education because it ‘wasn’t their place’, and now that the shoe is on the other foot…it hurts, doesn’t it?
3. 3rd time. You dont acknowledge what I said, you just try to make it into a competition.
Nah buddy, you did that when you said we didn’t fight for our rights because we didn’t die in a war.
And actually, voting rights were originally for land owners (both male and female), and in some states, literacy tests were in place. Which also targetted men.
Most states didn’t view property holding women in the same regard as men. We had to fight for that too. Unless you want to cough up state laws for that, I’ll wait.
My argument was that for the same rights, men must sacrifice more and are disadvataged more. When asking for “equality” those women did not ask for the same costs as men, and thus were not advocating for equality. Whether nale politicians sided with them (supported women) is irrelevent.
You already had the right to go to college and get bank loans. You could have your own credit cards and be seen as persons in the law.
4. No. They arent. Rape, as a crime, is gendered by definition for most of the world’s population. So if you raped me right now, depending on our location, you would not be charged with rape and would not have said rape included in statistics.
Yes, and why is that, my dear? Oh, it wouldn’t be because your sex commits the majority of it and males are overrepresented in sexual violence even in the animal kingdom?
Since we’re talking about rape and war here, I wonder what you think about the Red Army Rapes. Since German women didn’t fight in the war and all. Guess they were just asking for it.
That’s a major issue of inequality, but not related to my point. Once again, you ignore my point. It was that even in extreme cases, men have no say in if they are parents. Not just for a few cases, but flat across the board.
Extreme? Now it’s across the board? Pick one.
You are 100% responsible for pregnancy. Put a sock on it if you don’t want a baby. Take responsibility and stop seeing sex as a need – that’s what you tell us.
5. You clearly arent getting the issue. You want men to take responsibility, but not have a say.
You sired the kid, your sex pumps and dumps all the time, and feels the need to whine about child support. Spare me.
“You sired the child” equally applies to women. According to your argument, women should never be ableto talethe pill, have abortions, or give children up for adoption.
I don’t say that, actually. Conservative men sure do. And said conservative men, despite touting responsibility, seldom adopt those babies they wish to save.
“My body my rules” only makes sense of you inckude"my choice, my responsibility".
Don’t cum in women then.
6. The “male pill” was pulled because of a signifigant increase in risk of suicide and the fact that it could sterilize the man. A birth control pill iseant to control repriduction, not permenantly stop it. If femalebirth control had a noticable chance to sterilize the woman so she could never have kids again (along woth making her way more likelyto kill herself), it would be pulled as well.
AMAZING HOW IT WAS PULLED BECAUSE OF A RISK OF STERILITY FOR YOU POOR MEN, when the Pill has had decades of side effects for women – such as depression and personality changes. How ignorant can you be? Oh, I forgot: when it’s your body being threatened, when it’s your body being controlled, when your fertility is at risk, suddenly it all matters. Because you’re male.
Not that it matters. Youre yet again glossing over my point that women have multiple ways to opt out of being a parent. Men have NONE.
Don’t cum in women then.
7. This is just a waste of time at this point. You ha e no actual counterarguments. You just change the argument itself.
Pot, meet kettle.
Men should have the right to know they have kids. This shouldnt even be a question. It’s a right men do not have. And if you care about equality or men (you clearly dont), then this should be an issue for you.
Stop ejaculating in women, stop pumping and dumping, and invest in your partners instead of being loose with sex and this wouldn’t be a problem. AKA a proper patriarchy.
8. You dont know anything about circumcision. Babies can die from it, it is so painful and traumatic, that it literally changes a child’s brain, and all for something that doesnt matter (cleanliness which can be done with soap and water, appearance and reducing sexual pleasure).
FGM involves sewing up part of the vagina to where urine and menstrual blood come out of a single, tiny hole. This ‘stitch’ has to be torn open during pregnancy. A woman’s clitoris is removed because her pleasure is not considered important.
It is ONE thing to argue circumcision is bad. It is another when you argue from a position of pure fucking ignorance that FGM isn’t as bad as yours. Look it up, asshole.
9. Your experience with a select few MRAs do not speak on the movement. However, entire feminst organizations and famous feminists perpetuating misandry and systematic inequality woth suppirt of feminism does speak on feminism.
I know what your arguments are and how you view women. Male pill? Ban it, it might cause your sperm to die. Female pill? Keep it up, even when it alters moods and might damage the ecosystem.
Male circumcision? Evil, ban it. FGM? It’s not so bad, you can give birth with a C-section!
10. From the start, your respomses were nonsense. You made this into some kind of competition instead of admitting that these issues exist for men and should be handled.
You: ‘You don’t get to talk about your voting rights because you didn’t die in a war for them’
Also you: ‘Women shouldn’t be in the army, it reduces fitness and readiness’.
Pick one.
Trying to blame men and insisting women have it worse to avoid addressing systemstic misandry is exactly why it isnt taken seriously to this day.
If you cant provide a valid counterargument (and it seems you cant), then this is a waste of time.
We fought for the right to vote. You didn’t see us as equal human beings. Now that the shoe is on the other foot, now it suddenly matters. Lol.
And here you show that you donteven understand the argument. Like you didnt even read it. Anything tha
I never said that women shouldnt be able to vote because they arent forced in wars. I stated that the voting age being lowered was only done so because the conscription age was lowered. I stated that women got the benfit of this despite the entire outrage being about “old enough to fight, old enough to vote”. As in women were essentially handed an extra 3 years of voting. Those three years were essentially in exchange for the sacrifice of potential drafting. So women getting those extra 3 free years despite not being facing the risk that came with it can be seen as an inequality. Pay attention.
1. You have shown that you either didnt read or didnt understsnd the argument. Your entire talking point is based on that bad assumption. I’ve already addressed it, so im not doing it again.
2. You stated that women got these rights by themselves. Which is false. Just like with white people and slavery, tons of me were actually huge supporters of women’s rights. It was mostly the wealthy class and some more conservative areas that were against it.
Even in your response you included me in the group of bad men by saying “you opposed women from entering higher education”. No i didnt.
3. You didnt understand the argument. Or you were being willfully ignorant. Cant tell which.
4. Again, you didnt understand my argument. I stated that rape is gendered for the majority of the world’s population. You have no idea what actual rape rates are. The FBI only had a (almost) gender neutral rape definition in 2013. Most adults grew up in a time where women who raped were not called rapists, were not arrested foror charged with rape, and were not included in statistics. We still have states with gendered rape laws.
If you grew up being told that only black people could murder, that whwn any ither race killed someone the worst it could be was manslaughter, would your view of what is and isnt murder change because of a recent change in law? Probably not. Most of the world still doesnt recognize female rapists, so rape statistics are unreliable.
Your response was the same as before. Bad.
5. “My body, my rules” should mean “my body, my responsibility”.
If your only answer is to police how men have sex, the apply that same logic to women.
Again, ignoring my argument that includes women who steal sperm or rape men/boys.
You want tl blame men exclusively. You treat this as some contest or sports team.
6. Again, pay attention. The side effects for men were signifigantly worse than side effects for women’s birth control. It WAS NOT men getting the same side effects as women and not being able to handle it. We literally give men the same painful chemotherapy drugs as women. Not being able to handle a little suffering isnt the issue. It was MUCH more dangerous than women’s products, so the trial was pulled. And rightfully so.
Youre being purposely obtuse.
7. That’s not a counterargument. You havent had a valid one this entire post. Youre avoiding the questions and the topic whenever I make a point and youre being childish.
I literally listed a lack of reproductove rights men have. You did not acknowledge them or provide any counterargument that what I said was false.
Men lack reproductive rights. Instead of addressing the argument, you deflected to something that doesnt have to do with the argument. If you cant even admit when youre wrong, this is a waste of time.
8. Again, turning it into a competition instead of acknowledging that men are victimized.
I never said one was better or worse. I said one was nornalized while the other is seen as bad. I said that MGM was to reduce sexual pleasure (same as women) and was quite literally people (mostly mothers) controlling men’s bodies. The entire post is a counter to feminists (like you) insisting that no one controls men’s bodies. You were proven wrong and deflected.
9. Again, your arguments are based on your willful ignorance. I am against the male pill because its side effects are signifigantly worse. Im all for them making one, but if it has a signifigant chance of sterilizing you, it shouldnt be on the market. And I would apply that logic to any birth control pill for women.
You leep making these assumptions that I cannotor do not support the same rights and solutions for women. Again, you see this as some battleof the sexes than actually caring about the issues. It’s childish.
10. Again, willful ignorance and refusal to read.
“Now the shoe is on the other foot. Now it suddenly matters”
And here you admit your sexist doubke standards. You didnt care about the inequalities at all. You care about women. There’s a difference. Like feminists who claim to be against domestic violence, but laugh when the DV os female on male.
Im sorry for even interacting with you. You have added exactly nothing to the conversation. You cant or choose not to read what I write and just strawman my arguments to make them easier to argu against. You keep talking down to me, but you have nothing to back it up.
That’s not the game im playing with you. You have literally nothing to add tp the conversation but ignorance. I gave you a chance to correct this. You refused. We’re done.
warof18dollars12cents has the worst reading comprehension I’ve seen outside of a primary school for the deaf, dumb and blind. It’s just bizarre to watch.
And her repeated inability to see that telling a man “don’t cum in women then” is exactly the same as refusing a woman birth control or an abortion and telling her “don’t spread your legs then”… borders on the pathological; someone absolutely incapable of empathy or reason.
It’s terrifying that there are women out there like this, unable to understand the concepts of fairness, equality and reciprocity, just lumbering through the world howling whatever fancies pass through her brain and shouting down anyone who tries to reason with her.
You did right to end communication, as there was none.
Discussion ¬