( No Title )
friendly-neighborhood-patriarch:
A Geography Class for Racist People
Logic
Nobody thinks all Muslims are terrorists.
And you should probably not point to fucking India of all places when talking about Islamic terror. Considering the massive amount of terror attacks within India, due to the shared border with Pakistan, combined with the fact that Islam fucking hates idolaters, which Muslims consider Hindus to be.
“Nobody thinks all Muslims are terrorists.”
tell that to 1/3 of my followers and half my family.
and, please, don’t pull the Hindu vs Muslim b.s. Hindus started the thousand year feud and STILL regularly attacks Muslim neighborhoods.
Nobody thinks all Muslims are terrorists. I will repeat my example from another post.
Nobody thinks that if you line up 10,000 Muslims, every one of them is a terrorist. What you’ve said is a vast oversimplification of their opinion, which gets you nothing in the long run.
And I will pull the Hindu vs Muslim argument.
For well over 1000 years there have been numerous invasions and conquests of India by Muslims. And each and every time there have been atrocities. There are generations of hatred present there.
Mahmud started it, expanding his empire from Afganistan and Iran into India, where he desecrated and stole from temples. His empire basically transformed into what we know as modern day Pakistan, setting those boundaries.
Then you have the Mughals. Who butchered their way through India. Who are known not only to Hindus but are notable by the Sikhs because several of their martyrs are the children gurus who were beheaded by the Mughals for not converting to Islam.
You want to know why there is so much hatred between those two groups? Its because, without fail, Muslims were the invaders. They invaded and butchered their people. And in Islam, idolaters, those who worship multiple gods that are not Allah, are considered some of the WORST offenders of heresy.
You don’t see this level of hatred from native Indians against the British, who also conquered them, for a reason. The British didn’t commit nearly as many atrocities against Indian people, nor for as long, nor for the same reasons.
Violence begets more violence. But don’t act like the Hindus started it. The Muslim conquerors started it, starting well before the turn of the last century. Then it was constantly perpetuated by frequent attempts, and then successes, in conquering India. And it continues to modern day with the separation of India and Pakistan, with massive amounts of Islamic terror coming over the borders.
Maybe you and I will just have to disagree with this. I don’t like that the violence exists. But it does. And knowing how it started is important. And how it started, and was consistently perpetuated, was through Islamic conquest of India, the oppression and butchering of Indian people, and the forceful converting of Hindus and Sikhs to Islam by the sword.
The entire point was to not use India as an example when talking about Islamic terror. Because India not only has massive problems with Islamic terror but has a history of being attacked and conquered by Islamic invaders.
Yeah cuz OPs vaguely threatening way of putting it makes me pefectly comfortable.
Also its not racist. Muslims are not a race. Its racist to think that muslims gotta be brown.
so 2 billion islamic terrorists is a threat you don’t stand a chance against but they are not which I agree with. However enough of them are, and a majority of the ones that are not still share and support those extremist beliefs. So it’s still a threat…just one that can be dealt with if handled appropriately. Which in part means recognizing the problem. It comes across as threatening because lying about the intentions of Islam is a part of how muslims teach as a method for spreading Islam and gaining footholds in nations they wish to conquer. Regardless of whether or not a muslim picks up a gun and decides to shoot civilians muslims believe in the establishing a global caliphate. If they could do it with open warfare and a direct military assault they would have already, like they did in the past which resulted in the crusades. But the west has a vastly superior military force now, even excluding nukes. So they switched methods but the goal is the same it has been since the inception of Islam.
Also it’s funny they try to blame the conflicts with hindus and muslims on hindus when islam also can’t seem to co exist with judaism, christianity, buddhism, sikhism and other muslims. Eventually you have to figure out the common factor.
Now take away even terrorism, let’s forget about the people who slaughter innocent people for not being muslim or not being muslim enough. In a “moderate” muslim nation like Egypt the vast majority upwards of 80% believe it is simply a given that gays should be executed. The horrible barbaric laws in muslim nations that for example see women stoned to death for adultery because they were raped…are a part of islamic doctrine, their laws and their religion are inseparable. Many argue Islam is simply a totalitarian political system dressed as religion. It’s why these backwards practices are virtually the same in every nation islam has conquered.
Discussion ¬