Hlootoo's Art

markhamillz:

manonfireforchrist:

looksalittlesketchy:

your-uncle-dave:

venix-savreux:

tayalldaynyc:

theuppitynegras:

world history

In one sentence

70% of the bloodiest wars and conquests in history have been in china.
The Moors, Turks, Ottomans, Mongols, Huns, and Carthaginians have all conquered various parts of Europe at different points in history.
Japan carved out its own empire by taking islands from indigenous peoples Nd oft times putting them to the sword without any western influence.
The muslims conquests burned over a third of the Christian world to the ground.
The aztecs literally kidnapped people from other tribes to tear their hearts out.
With the exception of Britain, all of the worlds largest and bloodiest empires have been asian or middle eastern.

THESE NON-WHITE MEN ARE DANGEROUS.

Didn’t the Indians also fight other tribes in bloody wars and massacres wich included scalping, raping, cannabilism, etc?

Yep. The tribes were at war and conquering one another long before white people arrived. The only difference is that the white people came by boat. Nothing Britain did was anything new. Slavery existed long before. In fact it was Muslims that introduced Europeans to slavery as we know it

Of course, why we’re using Pocahontas, one of the most stupendously historically inaccurate films ever made, to make a comment on world history is another can of worms entirely. Not to mention that they state IN THE MOVIE that Pocahontas’ tribe just finished having an actual literal war with another tribe.