if you’re trying to make “social commentary” on the explotation of children maybe you shouldn’t exploit actual children in the process
Good analogy!
K, you’re showing your ignorance of what the film represents and is discussing, ESPECIALLY given that when this post was made, none of you actually had seen the film. Because you’re fucking reactionary dingbats.
Sad that I have to block this idiot.
mmm I have unfornately seen snippets of this “film” and heard from people who have watched it. You are missing the point it doesn’t matter what the film is discussing if it is actively harming and
exploitingchildren to makes it’s point good grief
Mmmmm, maybe know what you’re talking about before parroting Ted Cruz’s talking points.
Seeing snippets is very different from actually watching a movie, my pal.
Seeing snippets of children dancing in a highly sexualized manner tells me all I need to know. You seem to be missing the point, the movie could have a great message, a great story and lesson, whatever. But to make those points children were put into roles that actively exploit them,
invalidating
any message or meaning of the film. Stop defending this crap and think critically for a hot second. We can tell stories about why certain things are bad and immoral without actually hurting people to tell the story
You don’t actually know what you’re talking about because you haven’t seen the film, you fucking conservative tool.
10 bucks says this jackass is a sex offender
>comes onto thread to be smug and make no real argument
>says everyone else is prejudiced while throwing stereotypes around
>keeps responding instead of walking away
>acts like they’re the victim because they chose to block someone they will probably never interact with again
I think it’s appropriate their name has ‘celluloid’ in it, given all this projecting.
Discussion ¬