Human life begins at the moment of fertilization. http://ift.tt/1xeARBj
Some days you don’t even need to make fun of them, they do it all themselves. – Rachel
The pictures above demonstrate, yet again, the ignorance that permeates the ‘pro-choice’ community. Let me explain…
The yarn, essay, canvas, and cake ingredients represent the equivelent of a sperm and egg yet to be united. In other words, they represent a man and a woman BEFORE they have sex and BEFORE the sperm and egg unite, CREATING a new and unique LIVING HUMAN BEING.
I’m going to be generous and assume the chicken egg is fertilized and that it is male. If so, YES, there is a rooster LIVING inside that egg. If the egg was unfertilized, then it would fall into the same category as the other items listed.
The acorn IS fertilized and IS AN OAK. If you carefully peel back the seed casing, you will find an embryonic oak tree inside, just like this…
If you peer inside the womb of a pregnant mother, you will discover something very similar to the oak above…
And if you cracked open the egg, you would find a tiny rooster living inside.
The misinformation spread by ignorant pro-abortion activists like misandry-mermaid demonstrates why we continue to slaughter our unborn children. I assure you that you were the EXACT same human being while unborn that you are today. Everything about you – your eye color, hair color, voice, personality, skin tone, and thousands of other traits where decided at the instant of your fertilization. The human being shown in the original image above already had all of their traits locked in. Just like you did when you looked like them.
Some days you don’t even need to make fun of them, they do it all themselves. – Cultureshift
Perfect response.
Posts Tagged Anti-abortion
Human life begins at the moment of fertilization. http://ift.tt/1xeARBj
Some days you don’t even need to make fun of them, they do it all themselves. – Rachel
The pictures above demonstrate, yet again, the ignorance that permeates the ‘pro-choice’ community. Let me explain…
The yarn, essay, canvas, and cake ingredients represent the equivelent of a sperm and egg yet to be united. In other words, they represent a man and a woman BEFORE they have sex and BEFORE the sperm and egg unite, CREATING a new and unique LIVING HUMAN BEING.
I’m going to be generous and assume the chicken egg is fertilized and that it is male. If so, YES, there is a rooster LIVING inside that egg. If the egg was unfertilized, then it would fall into the same category as the other items listed.
The acorn IS fertilized and IS AN OAK. If you carefully peel back the seed casing, you will find an embryonic oak tree inside, just like this…
If you peer inside the womb of a pregnant mother, you will discover something very similar to the oak above…
And if you cracked open the egg, you would find a tiny rooster living inside.
The misinformation spread by ignorant pro-abortion activists like misandry-mermaid demonstrates why we continue to slaughter our unborn children. I assure you that you were the EXACT same human being while unborn that you are today. Everything about you – your eye color, hair color, voice, personality, skin tone, and thousands of other traits where decided at the instant of your fertilization. The human being shown in the original image above already had all of their traits locked in. Just like you did when you looked like them.
Some days you don’t even need to make fun of them, they do it all themselves. – Cultureshift
Perfect response.
Because only fetuses have the right to life, liberty and happiness. Because you know, people with uteri might not want or desire this for themselves, like… ever.
When you really think about it…
That’s interesting, because last I checked, fetuses weren’t capable of depriving their mothers of their rights to life, liberty or the pursuit of happiness. They also aren’t capable of killing anyone or bringing themselves into existence, so there goes that theory.
If you don’t like a comparison, you should refute it with logic instead of carelessly throwing around words like ‘racist.’
Okay so here’s a few exampes of how fetuses do this:
Life: Childbirth is 14x more dangerous than abortion. Childbirth kills women* every single year. Oh I forgot, you don’t care about the fact that THOSE are lives too.
Liberty: Are you saying that the fourteen year old rape victim who gets pregnant is ‘free’ when she is forced to give birth to her rapists child? Sounds pretty opressive to me.
Persuit of Happiness: The majority of women* who get an abortion report feelings of relief. And nearly every woman* who is turned away and denied abortion say they wished they had recieved the abortion. Sounds like the women* getting abortions are actually happier than the women* who seek one and are denied.
I try using logic but frankly you ignore everything anyone actually says and whine about how you’re not really a racist for compring a group of people who can feel, understand and are autonomous to fetuses. Fetuses who are non-autonomous, can’t feel pain and can’t understand anything.
You are almost directly saying people of colour can not understand things or feel pain or emotions and that they are not sentient when you compare them to fetuses. That’s racist.
That was an interesting read. But you didn’t really need to spend all that time typing, because you still didn’t prove a single point.
“here’s a few exampes of how fetuses do this:”
Life: Your example does not explain how the fetus is responsible for their mother’s loss of life, because death by childbirth is never the unborn child’s fault.
Liberty: Your example does not explain how the fetus is responsible for their mother’s loss of liberty because conception due to rape is never the unborn child’s fault.
Pursuit of Happiness: Your example does not explain how the fetus is responsible for their mother’s loss of happiness, unless you’re saying that it’s okay for a child to die for the sake of their mother’s happiness? “Whatever makes mommy happy?”
No, you’re trying to justify killing the fetus. If you were using logic, you would understand that in comparing abortion to the Pacific slave trade, I am not minimizing the suffering of one group. I’m just refusing to erase the suffering of the other. (The reason this bothers you is because, in order to have a clean conscious, you have to erase the suffering of the latter. You can’t acknowledge that the unborn are people, because then your religious dedication to abortion becomes abominable.)
In short, I’m not being racist; you’re being ageist. But thanks anyway for taking this time to talk with me and spread the truth about abortion by reblogging my post. 🙂
Have a great night!
A//AReblogging because that prolife comment above kicked ass.
Because only fetuses have the right to life, liberty and happiness. Because you know, people with uteri might not want or desire this for themselves, like… ever.
When you really think about it…
That’s interesting, because last I checked, fetuses weren’t capable of depriving their mothers of their rights to life, liberty or the pursuit of happiness. They also aren’t capable of killing anyone or bringing themselves into existence, so there goes that theory.
If you don’t like a comparison, you should refute it with logic instead of carelessly throwing around words like ‘racist.’
Okay so here’s a few exampes of how fetuses do this:
Life: Childbirth is 14x more dangerous than abortion. Childbirth kills women* every single year. Oh I forgot, you don’t care about the fact that THOSE are lives too.
Liberty: Are you saying that the fourteen year old rape victim who gets pregnant is ‘free’ when she is forced to give birth to her rapists child? Sounds pretty opressive to me.
Persuit of Happiness: The majority of women* who get an abortion report feelings of relief. And nearly every woman* who is turned away and denied abortion say they wished they had recieved the abortion. Sounds like the women* getting abortions are actually happier than the women* who seek one and are denied.
I try using logic but frankly you ignore everything anyone actually says and whine about how you’re not really a racist for compring a group of people who can feel, understand and are autonomous to fetuses. Fetuses who are non-autonomous, can’t feel pain and can’t understand anything.
You are almost directly saying people of colour can not understand things or feel pain or emotions and that they are not sentient when you compare them to fetuses. That’s racist.
That was an interesting read. But you didn’t really need to spend all that time typing, because you still didn’t prove a single point.
“here’s a few exampes of how fetuses do this:”
Life: Your example does not explain how the fetus is responsible for their mother’s loss of life, because death by childbirth is never the unborn child’s fault.
Liberty: Your example does not explain how the fetus is responsible for their mother’s loss of liberty because conception due to rape is never the unborn child’s fault.
Pursuit of Happiness: Your example does not explain how the fetus is responsible for their mother’s loss of happiness, unless you’re saying that it’s okay for a child to die for the sake of their mother’s happiness? “Whatever makes mommy happy?”
No, you’re trying to justify killing the fetus. If you were using logic, you would understand that in comparing abortion to the Pacific slave trade, I am not minimizing the suffering of one group. I’m just refusing to erase the suffering of the other. (The reason this bothers you is because, in order to have a clean conscious, you have to erase the suffering of the latter. You can’t acknowledge that the unborn are people, because then your religious dedication to abortion becomes abominable.)
In short, I’m not being racist; you’re being ageist. But thanks anyway for taking this time to talk with me and spread the truth about abortion by reblogging my post. 🙂
Have a great night!
A//AReblogging because that prolife comment above kicked ass.
Defying Pro-Choice-Based Stereotypes: Rape Survivors Who Kept Their Babies
Something, somewhat positive for today…. I encourage those who read this to look for other articles like this, as women like these are so underrepresented and are often ignored.
Defying Pro-Choice-Based Stereotypes: Rape Survivors Who Kept Their Babies
Something, somewhat positive for today…. I encourage those who read this to look for other articles like this, as women like these are so underrepresented and are often ignored.
Recent Comments