prolifeproliberty:

The challenge there is that both of those procedures carry some significant risks, especially the hysterectomy, and some doctors are hesitant to do tubal ligations on young women.

But I do think people should take responsibility for not getting pregnant if pregnancy is such a horrifying thing to them.

The reality is that we need better education on pregnancy and health, because the vast majority of women can safely carry to term with proper care and support. The risks are played way up, and the fear doesn’t help anyone.

Most importantly, we need OBs that value life and are willing to explore various options to help a mother safely carry, rather than pushing abortion at the first sign of a complication.

Oh I know there’s a risk either way. I’m mostly referring to those who are borderline rabid for abortions, to the point of sickness. The ones who unironically think the worse thing that can happen to a woman is to have a child, even if it’s directly caused by her actions and choices. If they have to have one surgery vs possibly multiple other ones (if they can be called those, I’m genuinely not sure) then I imagine it’d be a “safer” option to take the one that removes the possibility of pregnancy altogether. Then they can have as much unprotected sex as they want with truly no repercussions (pregnancy). You think more of them would do that instead, especially how some actively hate children and babies. Plus, no menstrual cycle which should be heaven from a rose-tinted glasses standpoint. Because let’s face it, many (not all. NOT. ALL.) of these abortion endorsers only want sex without consequences and abortions grant them that.

Might as well make a choice that grants it to you permanently and avoid the mess entirely.